“If a man have two wives, one beloved and another hated, and they have borne him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath; that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: but he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his” (Deut. 21: 15-17).

  The above passage is often left out of the reckoning by Replacement Theologians who say that God permanently excommunicated Israel in A.D. 70.  Indeed, among the great majority of Preterists that is deemed the standard theme of our Lord’s Olivet Discourse.  But as we have demonstrated several times, Replacement Theology, of whatever mold or make it may be, is patently untrue.   

   The quotation above once again confirms our view that it is impossible for God to permanently cast away Israel.  For Israel is Jehovah’s firstborn (Exodus 4: 22; Jeremiah 31: 9).  According to the above statute, it is unlawful to set the firstborn aside in preference to another, or to deny him the double portion. 

   But this is exactly what Replacement Theologians do.  They assert that Israel was cast away in A.D. 70, without any hope of a restoration according to a fulfillment of the law and the prophets –  notwithstanding that Jesus Christ said that every jot and tittle must be fulfilled before heaven and earth pass away (Matthew 5: 17).

  We, on the other hand, believe that Israel is a married wife (Jer. 3: 14), which though set aside for a season (Hosea 3: 3-4), will yet be recalled by Jehovah (Isaiah 54: 6-8) and blessed with a double portion during the Millennium (Isaiah 61: 7).  For it is not in the Lord’s counsels that Israel should be cast away:

(Hosea 11: 8-9) “How shall I give thee up, Ephraim?  How shall I deliver thee, Israel? How shall I make thee as Admah?  How shall I set thee as Zeboim?  Mine heart is turned within me, my repentings are kindled together.  I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim: for I am God and not man; the Holy One in the midst of thee: and I will not come against the city.”

   Admah and Zeboim were cities which were destroyed along with Sodom and Gomorrah (Deut. 29: 23).  The nation of Israel will not suffer the same fate.  For Jehovah is God and not man!  Although man would have Israel cast away forever, the Lord promises to restore them.  He expressly affirms, through His inspired prophet and mouthpiece, that He will not destroy Israel. Because He is God and changeth not, the sons of Jacob are not consumed (Malachi 3: 6).  The gifts and calling of God are without change of mind (Romans 11: 29).  That settles the issue of Replacement Theology.

  The church is not Israel, but is likened to an espoused bride (2 Corinthians 11: 2).  The marriage has not yet taken place.  Whereas Israel is a married wife.  R.T.’s need to note this difference, because it forms a real distinction between Israel and the church.  The church is being built up during the time when Israel abides in blindness.  This blindness is not permanent (Romans 11: 11), but will be removed at the Lord’s second coming (Romans 11: 26-27; Isaiah 29: 18-19).

   The church does not receive blessings here on earth.  The church’s blessings are in heavenly places in Christ (Eph. 1: 3).  Israel’s blessings are on earth, and to them pertains the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises (Romans 9: 4).  Let R.T.’s take careful note of that last statement: to Israel pertains the promises.  And Jesus Christ came to confirm these promises (Romans 15: 8).

   In no Scripture does it state that the church has “replaced” or “superseded” Israel.  This is an unbiblical figment of man’s theology, and comes from a Roman Catholic mindset in which it is assumed (without Biblical warrant) that the visible church receives all the promises made to Israel.  Frankly, I find it hard to believe that the very church which gave us the sale of indulgences and the veneration of icons is she which hath replaced Israel. 

  No.  That is simply not true!  Israel was never replaced, but only set aside for a season, that salvation might go out to the Gentiles.  The Gentiles do not inherit any of Israel’s earthly blessings.  Israel has already been adopted to receive these blessings, and nothing can or will annul God’s decree.  However, the church can and does receive spiritual blessings, which Israel will also enjoy during the Millennium (Jer. 31: 31-34).  And this will be the “double portion” that Israel receives.  May all of God’s promises reach fruition.