The Sign Of The Prophet Jonas

 Pre-Millennialists are often taxed by Preterists for their reluctance to adhere to what are called “timing texts.”  According to Preterists, these texts all imply the imminency of Jesus Christ’s second coming, the resurrection of the dead, and the judgment.  Perhaps one reason why most Pre-Millennialists disregard the issue is because everyone knows that there was no second coming of Christ in A.D. 70.  Nevertheless, a close study of the timing texts will be beneficial to the reader, inasmuch as they help to prove one thing and one thing only: that the second coming was imminent in the first century.

 Yes, I say WAS imminent.  In other words, the Lord’s coming was “at hand” in the first century, when the inspired apostles issued the Gospel call, to the Jews first and then to the Gentiles.  But does God ever postpone His judgments? And if so, why? In this brief study I’d like to look at the “sign of the prophet Jonas,” which helps to prove my position that the then-imminent coming of Christ preached during the first century was put off, due to the repentance of the Gentiles.

  Let us remember that Christ promised the Jews that no sign would be given them except the sign of the prophet Jonas.  “This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.  For as Jonas was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also the Son of Man be to this generation” (Luke 11: 29-30). 

  In order to learn the nature of this “sign,” we ought to go back to the Book of Jonah.  The book contains the prophetic types that unlock Christ’s words, revealing what would happen during the first century.  Jonah, after emerging from the belly of the whale (which in his prayer he equates with hell) entered into Ninveh and cried: “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown” (Jonah 3: 4).  This was warning of an imminent judgment upon the people of Nineveh.

 But look at how the city responded to his preaching. The people believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth (Jonah 3: 5 ff.).  They repented, and when the Lord saw their repentance, judgment was deferred.  “And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil that He had said that He would do unto them; and He did it not” (Jonah 3: 10).  Because of the repentance of the people, mercy overruled judgment.

 Now, we all recognize that Jonah was a type of Christ.  “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly, so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matt. 12: 40).  Christ’s resurrection, then, was the antitype of Jonah’s deliverance from the belly of the whale.  And what happened next?  After our Lord arose, “He showed Himself alive after His passion, by many infallible proofs, being seen of them [the apostles] forty days, and speaking of things pertaining to the kingdom of God” (Acts 1: 3). 

  This forty days of oral instruction corresponds to the forty days of probation given the city of Nineveh.  And according to prophetical usage (Numbers 14: 34; Ezekiel 4: 6), a year was given for each day– issuing in a forty year period of grace extended to “that generation.”  For the first fifteen years after our Lord’s ascension, the sign of Jonas the prophet (i.e., the resurrection of Christ) was preached exclusively to Jews and proselytes.  “Unto you first,” said Peter, “God, having raised up His Son Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities” (Acts 3: 26).

  Then, after Peter had used his keys to grant Gentiles access into the Kingdom, the sign of Jonas was preached under the ministry of Paul, for an additional sixteen years.  The Gospel was preached to both Jews and Gentiles alike; though during this period, Jews were still given the priority of hearing the message (Acts 13: 5, 14, 42-43; 14: 1; 17: 1, 10, 17; 18: 4, 7, 19, 26; 19: 9).  When they rejected the good news, the Gospel was then offered to the Gentiles (Acts 13: 46; 18: 6; 28: 25-28). 

   What was the substance of this message?  According to Acts 17: 18, it was “Jesus, and the resurrection.”  According to Acts 19: 21, it was “repentance toward God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.”  In other words, it was the sign of the prophet Jonas!  It was a message which spoke of the necessity of repentance, the salvation wrought by Christ through the resurrection, and an impending judgment of the habitable world (see Acts 17: 31, Greek text).

  According to the prophetic type contained in the Book of Jonah, we find that every element of Jonah’s ministry thus far has a first-century antitype.  And most Preterists will generally recognize this. But when they get to the issue of repentance and postponement of judgment, they stop, and can proceed no farther.  They are unable to find an antitype, inasmuch as they believe the Second Coming, resurrection, and judgment happened in A.D. 70!  But yet, as the facts stand, only Jerusalem was destroyed at the end of the forty years of probation (A.D. 30-70). 

   Why?  The answer is quite simple.  Because the Jews rejected the sign of Jonas, whereas the Gentiles repented and accepted it.  Therefore, the second coming of Christ, which would have occurred in the first century had the nations failed to repent, was postponed, along with the resurrection and judgment.  This was the antitype of Nineveh’s repentance. When the Jews had finally rejected the sign of Jonas in 62 A.D., Paul said: “Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent to the Gentiles, and that they will hear it” (Acts 28: 28, italics mine).

  A little later, Paul praised God, writing that the Gospel preached in all the world, “bringeth forth fruit, as it doth also in you” (Col. 1: 6).  And where was this fruit coming from?  Certainly not from the Jews, who forbade the apostles to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved (1 Thess. 2: 16).  The fruit was being borne by the Gentiles.  And because the Gentiles repented, and the Gospel prevailed over the hearts of so many, God could not bring the world into judgment.  Hence, He postponed the second coming in accordance with His established principles of mercy (see Genesis 18: 23-32).

  Remember that when the Son of Man is revealed, the conditions of the world will be “as in the days of Noah” and “as in the days of Lot” (Luke 17: 26-30).  Not when the Gospel is bearing fruit among all nations, but after a “falling away“– when few at all believe the Gospel.  As Christ Himself asked: “When the Son of Man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18: 8).  And as Paul, speaking to the Gentiles, affirmed: “That day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and the man of sin be revealed” (2 Thess. 2: 3, italics mine).

  It is clear that Preterists have not “rightly divided the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2: 15) concerning the sign of the prophet Jonas.  It is up to them now to accept these blessed truths, and to realize that God did not fail to produce the fruits of repentance in the nations that heard the Gospel.  The word did not return unto Him void (Isaiah 55: 11).  It accomplished the repentance of those to whom it was sent, thus fulfilling the antitype of God’s forgiveness of the Ninevites.

  In conclusion: The timing texts used by Preterists only show that the second coming was imminent when the words were first spoken or written.  Since these words were issued during the forty year period of probation (A.D. 30-70) there was a possibility that the Gentiles might repent, and that judgment would be put off.  I submit that this is precisely what happened, and is why the early church knew nothing about any invisible, hypothetical coming of Christ in the first century.

  To say that there was a worldwide judgment in A.D. 70, after the Gospel had been preached with power to the Gentiles (1 Thess. 1: 5), and believed on in the world (1 Tim. 3: 16), is to hold a pessimistic “doom and gloom” Christianity which makes God an unjust exactor of revenge upon those who turn unto Him in faith and repentance.  Moreover, it breaks the typology of Jonah’s “sign,” rendering “fulfillment” without any effect whatsoever.  Let Preterism once more stand condemned.  Maranatha!


8 Comments Add yours

  1. Hey Brian-

    The things you present here are new for me, so I will consider them. But there is one thing that sticks out to me. While Israel did not repent, a remnant obviously did. Gentiles did repent, but not nations as a whole. So while many Gentiles did repent, even more did NOT.

    When Israel nationally repents, this will not close the door for salvation to the Gentiles, but will open the way for Gentile nations as a whole to repent during the Millennail Kingdom.

    While there are obviously parallels between Jesus and Jonah, I don’t know if we can go farther than the way Jesus draws the parallel for the sign. There are some things that constrict us from going into too much detail. For instance, Jesus was not in the belly of the whale because He failed to preach. Also, Jesus was not upset when Gentiles repented and God’s wrath was delayed.

    For me, I have always taken the “sign of Jonah” to be that Jesus would be in the belly of the earth 3 days and 3 nights, and nothing further.

    As far as first century immanence, I see immanence as being defined by Jesus. He may come at any time, but it will be preceded by signs so that the general times and seasons may be known.

    Have fun and stay busy – Luke 19:13

    -The Orange Mailman

  2. Hi Darrin,

    As I see it, Christ was cast into the belly of the whale (grave) not for His own disobedience but for ours. So our sin must be the antitype of Jonah’s disobedience. Of course, you’re right that some elements of the prophecy don’t match 100%. As for imminency, I agree that the Second Coming is imminent at any given time, and that it will be preceded by ‘signs’ like the “falling away” and revelation of Antichrist. However, I think the uncertain timing of the second coming was fixed when the Jewish nation as a whole rejected the Gospel message. A few believed, but it wasn’t enough to overset the calamity of Jerusalem. Christ promised that He would only return when the Jewish nation repents (Matt. 23: 39; Acts 3: 19-21). I see this as a wholesale national repentance.

    The scattering of Israel was foretold by Christ in Luke 21, but the period of the ‘times of the Gentiles’ was uncertain. On the other hand, the Gospel prevailed so much among the Gentiles that Christ could not have judged the world in the first century, as Preterists claim. So, as I see it, a mixture of Jewish unbelief and Gentile acceptance offset the coming of Christ–whereas the Bible tells us that His coming will occur when things are just the opposite: after there has been a falling away among the nations, and when the Jews turn to God.

    The main reason I wrote this article was to combat the erroneous view that Preterists hold, that Jesus Christ came in the first century. I am showing that according to Scriptural typology, He couldn’t have come, because the world was not ‘as in the days of Noah and Lot.’

    Although some disagree with me, I think the BIble unquestionably teaches that an imminent judgment can sometimes be postponed through the mercy of God. Another example of this was when King Hezekiah was told to put his house in order, for he was about to die. Then when Hezekiah prayed to God, God had mercy, and extended his life by 15 years. By making the shadow on the sundial go ten degrees backwards, God showed that He has power to delay, reverse, or put off His impending judgments.

    Peace & Health,


  3. Heyhey-

    I definitely agree that the conditions in the first century were not as in the days of Noah and Lot, due primarily to the preaching of the gospel amongst the Gentiles and the belief expressed in them. And I also agree that judgement can be postponed, numerous scriptures can be provided. Even wicked King Ahab’s judgement was postponed. But I’m not sure about connecting the dots between the two as you are. In short, I’m not sure that a worldwide judgement scheduled for the first century was postponed. Maybe I will someday, but not yet.

    Have fun and stay busy – Luke 19:13

    -The Orange Mailman

  4. Hi Darrin,

    Well, if we as Christian brethren always agreed on all points, discussions would be pretty boring! At any rate, I always enjoy hearing your input on these things, and have learned a great deal from your writings and comments.

    Peace & Health,


  5. Zuddmyyr says:

    3X1ICY comment1 ,

  6. Dave says:

    When Israel nationally repents, this will not close the door for salvation to the Gentiles, but will open the way for Gentile nations as a whole to repent during the Millennail Kingdom.

    Nonsense. Salvation is open to all until the temple is complete, which has been nearly 2000 years in the making. Once this happens time (of the nations) is no more and the 7th trumpet sounds signifying the Messiah’s return, resurrection of the righteous dead, and judgment of the living wicked. No one will be able to enter the temple until the fireworks are over.

    Also, there is no such thing any more as national repentance. That is for a bygone era with a bygone covenant.

  7. amy says:


  8. amy says:

    hear what the scritures are telling us now. the return of our savior is clear. read it , for in the scriptures you think you have eternal life. the words “immediatly after” is a really good eye opener.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s